Daniel Richter at Galerie Thaddaeus Ropac

Daniel Richter Besuch der Wirklichkeit 2010 Daniel Richter at Galerie Thaddaeus Ropac

Under the title Spagotzen, a neologism coined by the artist, Daniel Richter’s most recent exhibition at Galerie Thaddaeus Ropac comprises fifteen works showing mysterious figures bathed in an artificial light typical of Richter, against a sometimes seismographically linear background. They seem like actors on a stage, engaged in strange kinds of interaction. Richter’s new block of works is distinguished on the one hand by an innovative, graphic, almost secessionist style, the paint applied like varnish, and on the other by a novel orientation towards the world of symbolism at the turn of last century, the mysticism of Odilon Redon and Felix Vallotton’s compositions dominated by flat areas of black and white contrasts.

“Ultimately, there is no difference between abstract and figurative painting – apart from particular forms of their decipherability. But the problems of organising paint on surface always remain essentially the same. In both cases, it is the same method that makes its way through various forms.” Thus Daniel Richter commented in 2004 on his change from abstract to representational painting – a personal turn-round which he carried out at the turn of the century. Born in 1962, the artist has shaped painting in Germany since the 1990s as few others have done. In his large-scale oil paintings, Richter dovetails set pieces of art history, mass media and pop culture into idiosyncratic, narrative pictorial worlds.

Daniel Richter Installation View 2010 Daniel Richter at Galerie Thaddaeus Ropac

Daniel Richter studied 1992-1996 with Werner Buttner – one of the protagonists, along with Martin Kippenberger, of the revival of expressive trends in painting during the 1980s – at the Hamburg Academy of Fine Arts, and worked as assistant to Albert Oehlen. Initially, he did abstract paintings, with a cosmos of forms intensely colourful to the point of being psychedelic – somewhere between graffiti and intricate ornamentation. His orientation was divided equally between Surrealism, Underground and the intricate, elongated bodily forms of Italian Mannerism.

Since 2002 he has painted large-scale scenes filled with figures, often inspired by reproductions from newspapers or history books. These show conflict and menace in excessive aggression and vitality. Richter’s change to figurative painting was often acclaimed as a “Renaissance of the historical painting”. However, while the classic historical painting relied on clear narrative with the aim of legitimising something contemporary by referring to some past event, Richter deals with the failure of social utopias.” I was interested in ways of referring to the world and to a world view that I wish to perceive or describe”, he said in 2007.

Daniel Richter die Entdeckung Europeus 2010 Daniel Richter at Galerie Thaddaeus Ropac

In Richter’s paintings, space – in so far as it is indicated – always has the effect of a stage, and usually of an abstract geometrical place. For Bartok’s Cantata Profana at the 2008 Salzburg Festival, Richter created a monumental, flamboyant panel-painting with niches and indentations set at right angles, and tiny port-holes through which the members of the chorus looked out and sang, thus forming a conglomeration of figures typical of Richter’s work. Superabundance in his painting is followed by reduction: for Bartók’s one-act opera Duke Bluebeard’s Castle, Richter built a stage-set with three huge dark veils, arranged to form a box and appliquéd with lengths of grey and black fabric intertwining like branches or veins. The two aesthetic poles of reduction/darkness/mysticism and painterly excess/colour/ light – characteristic in general of Richter’s work – were clearly manifest on this occasion, in the form of two stage-sets. Daniel Richter returns to the Salzburg Festival in 2010 to design the set for Vera Nemirova’s production of Alban Berg’s second opera, Lulu.

Richter’s subjects suggest allusion to current politics, but on closer inspection, we see that this is not so. “Events, whether conveyed through the media or through his own experience, appear to serve Richter rather as a projection screen for his inner images, the origins of which remain concealed from the viewer” (Fritz W. Kramer, 2002). Daniel Richter enjoys playing around with an iconography of radical political gestures.

Text and images provided by Galerie Thaddaeus Ropac

Related posts:

  1. Daniel Rozin at Bitforms Gallery
  2. Max Weiler at Galerie Elisabeth & Klaus Thoman
  3. Davide Balula at Galerie Frank Elbaz
Explore posts in the same categories: Exhibitions

Comment:


site tracking with Asynchronous Google Analytics plugin for Multisite by WordPress Expert at Web Design Jakarta.